Macroeconomists study aggregated indicators such as GDP, unemployment rates, and price indices to understand how the whole economy functions. The second approach would tackle analysis of the economy as a whole. Economists figured out long ago that in order to understand the economy, they would have to employ a double-pronged approach. The first approach would look at the economy by gathering data from individuals and firms on a small scale. But, the data which we sent on the network printers are still in the unencrypted format. There are CEOs from various industries who still do not realize the importance of having these metrics in their system. There is a specific 90-round handgun course of fire qualification process that includes not only a hands-on portion but also a classroom instruction. Thus, there is a need for a good company who is able to provide you relevant solutions for your event and thus ensure that it is completed successfully.

One way to keep a company safe is to limit the access of the outside world. Well, you need what every company needs; customers. Macro information security also extends externally to support partners and customers as well as ensure compliance with regulations. Thus was born micro and macro economics. Microeconomics is a branch of economics that studies how individuals, households and firms make decisions to allocate limited resources, typically in markets where goods or services are being bought and sold. If we divide information security in the same manner as economics (its analytical form), we get micro information security and macro information security. Macro information security is the big picture and can be utilized to keep management in the loop. If you need to differentiate between the role that does technical work and one which does leadership work, you can use incident response/handling for the former and incident management for the latter.

Advanced age and a history of unskilled work or no work experience would ordinarily offset any vocational advantages that might accrue by reason of any remote past education, whether it is more or less than limited education. First, a little history. If you review the day-by-day course overview you’ll see that only one day, the first, involves Incident Handling Step-by-Step and Computer Crime Investigation. The GIAC Certified Incident Handler (GCIH) designation is 83% inappropriate. I think SANS is the organization that needs to examine how it uses the term incident handler or incident handling. Macrosecurity types like to think about aggregate risk, capturing metrics, and enterprise-wide security postures. Microsecurity types prefer to focus on individual networks, hosts, applications, operating systems, and hardware, along with specific attack and defense options. The bottom line is that incident handling and response are synonyms, and those who think they are certified to do incident handling and response via GCIH are kidding themselves. I just noticed a post on the ISC site titled Incident Response vs. I tried pointing that out via a comment on the ISC post, but apparently the moderators aren’t willing to accept contradictory comments.

I am not sure why (ISC)² is increasing the experience requirement. As of that date, the minimum experience requirement for certification will be four years or three years with a college degree or equivalent life experience. This is dangerous. Second, respondents to the latest SANS 2008 Salary Survey considered their GCIH certification to be their most important certification. Third, SANS offers courses with far more IR relevance that that associated with GCIH, namely courses designed by Rob Lee. In my last post I mentioned I will be speaking at another SANS IR event this summer. Last year I wrote FISMA is a joke.. 250,000 per person per calendar year. The class covered technical methodologies for responding to and handling incidents. To be fair, the title for the course which prepares students for the GCIH is Hacker Techniques, Exploits & Incident Handling. Incident Handling is the logistics, communications, coordination, and planning functions needed in order to resolve an incident in a calm and efficient manner. I will also not deny that one should understand hacker techniques and exploits in order to do incident response/handling, but that knowledge should be its own material — something to know in addition to the skills required for IR.